by James M. Wall
In the beginning was Donald J. Trump’s false birther tweet, posted four years ago.
The Los Angeles Times‘ Matt Pearce remembers: “On Aug. 6, 2012, the Twitter account @realDonaldTrump posted an important public announcement: “An ‘extremely credible source’ called my office and told me that @BarackObama’s birth certificate is a fraud’.”
Donald Trump’s presidential campaign began with that false statement from an “extremely credible source”.
The birther allegation was so obviously false that it should have fallen into the trash heap of absurdity. Instead, an alarming number of Republican voters took the birther nonsense seriously enough to launch Trump’s campaign for president, a campaign one final election away from placing “birther” Trump in the White House.
Trump’s style of short falsehoods embellished with insulting adjectives (“crooked Hillary”), is tailor-made for Twitter. The Times‘ Mike Pearce points to August 6, four years ago, and asks:
Who was the source? (Why was “extremely credible source” in quotation marks?) Donald Trump didn’t say. Nor did he offer evidence to back up his claim. But out it went to his millions of Twitter followers.
Trump’s style has not changed. His tweets and public speeches continue with the same misleading bellicosity with the hashtag @realDonaldTrump. Here is one recent 2016 tweet:
The failing @nytimes has become a newspaper of fiction. Their stories about me always quote non-existent unnamed sources. Very dishonest!
The polls, state by state, show that Trump is headed for a blowout defeat. In a normal campaign this would be a call for shift in strategy. Trump, however, is not running a normal campaign. Why won’t he change?
Peter Danou, former advisor to both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, writes in his Blue Nation Review:
Donald Trump is not running a campaign to win the American presidency. Rather, he is using his presidential run as a vehicle to achieve a larger personal ambition: To be seen as the leader of a “white [nationalist] awakening” — the term David Duke used to describe his campaign.
Accustomed to political campaigns run to be won, Danou’s proposition appears far-fetched. But is it? Danou again:
By accident or design, Trump is now seeking what he sees as a greater glory than the mere presidency. His strategy could be described as “lose at all costs.” That’s not to say he wants to lose. Far from it. He’d happily advance his agenda from the Oval Office.
That makes more sense. Trump wants to win. He is gambling that his twitter style campaigning could put him in the White House. If he loses?
Peter Danou suggests that Trump. . .
. . . is willing to pay the price of defeat, denunciation and even disgrace to become a (darkly) transformational figure in American history, organizing and empowering the extreme right, mainstreaming their views with the help of a timid national media, and fully awakening the forces of bigotry and intolerance that lurk in the shadows of American society.
We’ve seen this movie before. The modern state of Israel was founded on the certainty that only Jews should control their state. Ethnic/racial nationalism is another form of white nationalism.
Since 1947, succeeding Israeli governments have marched behind their ethnic nationalism, playing on western guilt to emerge as the last remaining white colonial empire. Non-Jews, the indigenous Palestinians, were to be systematically removed.
The most recent obscene removal action was reported Sunday by Ha’aretz: 
Israel is conducting a land survey between the settlement of Efrat, (right) and the area to its east with an eye toward declaring state land there, according to a document submitted by the state to the High Court of Justice last week. According to the document, the survey has been undertaken “in a manner that will create contiguity of state lands.”
Meanwhile, in the U.S. political campaign which ignores Israel’s oppressive occupation, the latest (August 14) count on Electoral Vote finds Hillary Clinton leading 368 to 164, with six states too close to call.
This movement to Clinton virtually guarantees the election of one of Israel’s favorite politicians. Old war hawks likes neoconservative John Negroponte see in Clinton a kindred spirit:
In the 1980s, [Negroponte] served as the U.S. ambassador to Honduras. In addition to (at best) covering for that country’s murderous autocrats, he also served the Reagan Administration by helping to turn Honduras into a staging area for American-trained death squads in places like El Salvador and Guatemala.
The Republican establishment, aware of the danger to its own brand and vulnerable down-ballot candidates, moved to soften Trump’s tweeter style. Matt Pearce found a more conventional tone in some of Trump’s tweets.
Trump has gotten in trouble several times for retweeting images linked to white supremacists. But Trump’s addition of veteran communications advisor Jason Miller to his campaign in June has corresponded with a somewhat calmer-seeming social media presence. This has led outsiders to scour Trump’s tweets to figure out which are sent by his staff and which are fired off by Trump himself.
One of those outsiders was data scientist David Robinson of New York, who was curious about the professionalization of some of Trump’s recent Twitter feeds.
“A lot of Americans are fascinated with the raw Donald Trump, not the image the campaign puts forward,” said Robinson.
Compiling data from Trump’s tweets, Robinson published a deep analysis this week that showed Trump tweets originating from different devices — both iPhone and Android — and which showed that Android Trump is quite a bit more belligerent than iPhone Trump. . .”When Trump wishes the Olympic team good luck, he’s tweeting from his iPhone. When he’s insulting a rival, he’s usually tweeting from an Android,” Robinson wrote.
The “raw Donald Trump” uses an Android phone to send out his “dog whistle” political language tweets. His staff uses an iPhone. Trump’s Android coded tweets convey “white nationalism”. His political adherents hear his meaning the way a dog hears a whistle humans cannot hear.
The congratulation and thank-you tweets are conventional messages that mean what they say.
From his earliest campaign speeches and tweets, Trump’s warning of Mexican immigrants “flooding across our borders” sends his racist message to those who long for just such a message.
Trump is also preparing his followers with rationale for losing by using a phrase like “rigged election” or a word like “cheating”, a term he employed this weekend in Pennsylvania.
To conclude this journey into the dark side of a possible Trump victory, one spontaneous incident offers hope.
In his Sunday column, which is concerned that Trump is making the U.S. a “meaner nation”, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof reported one example of America at its best.
In Georgia, an India-born Muslim named Malik Waliyani bought a gas station and convenience store a few months ago and was horrified when it was recently burglarized and damaged. He struggled to keep it going. But then the nearby Smoke Rise Baptist Church heard what had happened.
“Let’s shower our neighbor with love,” Chris George, the pastor, told his congregation at the end of his sermon, and more than 200 members drove over to assist, mostly by making purchases. One man drove his car around until the gas tank was empty, so he could buy more gas.
Our hope at this moment is that those Smoke Rise Baptists, from Stone Mountain, Georgia, represent more southern voters than those Trump can rouse with his racist “dog whistles”.
The picture at top of Barack Obama being sworn in for his first term in January, 2009, is from Wikipedia. The picture from the illegal Efrat settlement is from Ha’aretz.
Wallwritings 
Julian Assange said it well: “When men in positions of power tell lies, I get annoyed.”
Jim, — I have no problem with people who object to Donald Trump. But if he is really as bad as you claim he is, it was the duty of the Democratic Party to put up a responsible candidate for President, as could have been done, and not to rig the nomination for Hillary Clinton, who is the most corrupt politician to seek the White House in living memory. The little meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch in Phoenix, and the aftermath, are too plain in meaning to be misunderstood.
Paul Craig Roberts is correct in his assessment: a vote for Hillary is a vote for war. She is in with the neo-cons who are all voting for her this fall. Bill Kristol is for her. She and Kristol wanted an invasion of Iraq, while Trump opposed it. I blamed George Bush for the tragedy which followed, but I also blame Democrats who, on lobbying of AIPAC, assured that the war powers resolution, authorizing the invasion, was premised on weapons of mass destruction which did not exist, and did not require approval of the United Nations Security Council before commencement of military operations. Hillary wants to agitate tensions in eastern Europe, using NATO. Trump says NATO is obsolete, as is undoubtedly true, and wants to attempt a rapprochement with Putin.
Now you want to blame Trump on the “birther” question. Contrary to what you maintain, I can say, as a specialist in forensic science and medicine, that the image of Obama’s birth certificate as posted on April 27, 2011, was a computer generated forgery, just like the collapse of the twin towers and building #7 at the World Trade Center on 9/11 was caused by professionally engineered controlled demolition, not aircraft collisions and office fires, and the single bullet theory peddled by the Warren Commission does not prove that JFK was shot by a lone nut.
I can accept that the United States are in rapid decline and fall. And I fear there is no remedy now available. But we cannot save our country unless we face facts. — John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X)
Julian Assange should have been equally, if not more, wary of women when in position of power tell lies!
You are keeping me more or less sane, Jim.
Please, Mr..Graham!
What you have given us here is a collection of the talking points regularly repeated across the USA on an hourly basis by the likes of FOX News, Limbaugh and Hannity. (Eg., “Hillary Clinton … the most corrupt politician to seek the White House in living memory.”). And, tangled up in their own underwear, the Republicans have chosen a their standard bearer an addled, egocentric narcissist who regularly lets his alligator mouth overload his tadpole ass!
Your logic that shifts some — if not all — of the blame for the limited choice for POTUS to the Democrats is sub-sophomoric, to wit: “. . . it was the duty of the Democratic Party to put up a responsible candidate for President .” In all due respect, Counselor, Secretary Clinton is a candidate who — despite FOX News and talk radio’s cornucopia of lies and distortions — is sufficiently “responsible” to defeat the xenophobic, fascist Mr. Trump.
Fascist? Yes, “fascist”!
Benito Mussolini, 1936: “I Will Bring Back The Glory That Was Rome!”
Donald Trump, 2016: “I Will Make America Great Again!”
Maybe the DNC could have done better, but facing nothing more challenging in 2016 than a carbon copy the 2012 Clown Car, anything more would seem to be wasted effort.
David Timm, — Do you really think the meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch in Phoenix was on the level?
Do you really believe that resurgent nationalism against the powers of high finance is fascism?
When I was a Democrat I felt a moral responsibility to give the country an acceptable candidate with a corruption-free background.– Jack Graham
Mr. Graham, well said. Not an American, I share the perspective of many of those who are disenfranchised in the election of the self-proclaimed “leader of the free world.” Trump threatens to be a nightmare for the 50 states of your union as perhaps the ultimate neo-lib, but promises to spare us Hillary’s bloody neo-con agenda and even possibly nuclear war.
If Trump is true to his word, in all likelihood the Syrian conflict will be quickly resolved — the largest refugee- (read misery-) producing war since WWII, while seeing Russia as a partner for peace. Bring it on.
In the midst of all the “talking points” above, I think it would be relevant to point out that, in politics, recognition is more than half of the battle for votes. The so-called “mainline” media have consistently published more minutes/column inches for Trump than any other candidate. So, Trump is not a Republican candidate. He is the media’s candidate.
And it is true. A vote for Hillary is a vote for war…and the sale of more war materials!