It is a well-known fact of history that to the victor belongs the spoils.
And one of those spoils is the ability to reshape history. Donald Trump has won the presidency. He is now busy reshaping history.
On Wednesday, President Trump met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House. The usual “we want peace” talking points were exchanged. The word “justice” was not included.
Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike were ignored by Trump. Sean Spicer, Trump’s press spokesman, later claimed the President suggested to Abbas that he cease funding families of political prisoners held in Israeli jails.
Since that would be both inhumane to the prisoners and politically devastating to President Abbas, he most certainly would have brushed aside such an idea.
President Trump began his cordial welcoming words to President Abbas with one of those blatant distortions of history that good staff work might have avoided. Unless, that is, the distortion was deliberate.
This is the way President Trump welcomed President Mahmoud Abbas to the White House: “Almost 24 years ago, it was on these grounds that President Abbas stood with a courageous peacemaker, then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Here at the White House, President Abbas signed a Declaration of Principles — very important — which laid the foundation for peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.”
Not content with this shading of truth, Trump sought to link the Oslo Accords to what he believes could be his own Trumpian contribution to history:
“Mr. President, you signed your name to the first Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. You remember that well, right? And I want to support you in being the Palestinian leader who signs his name to the final and most important peace agreement that brings safety, stability, and prosperity to both peoples and to the region.”
There is a problem with this recall of history. It writes former Palestinian President Yasser Arafat out of a major moment of history.
Abbas was, indeed, a member of the Palestinian delegation which traveled to the White House for the historic September, 1993, signing ceremony.
Abbas was certainly in the Palestinian delegation headed by then-PLO leader Yasser Arafat. He most certainly did not sign with “a courageous peacemaker, then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin”.
And, he did not stand with Yitzhak Rabin. That would be Yasser Arafat, as the historic picture (above), clearly demonstrates.
Rabin did not sign the statement. Arafat did not sign it. They had representatives to do the signing for them.
The BBC remembers the signing: “The leaders did not sign the declaration themselves. Instead, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, and his Palestinian counterpart did the signing.
“His Palestinian counterpart” was indeed, Mahmoud Abbas.
Wikipedia has a more detailed story about the signing.
The Oslo I Accord officially called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements was an attempt in 1993 to set up a framework that would lead to the resolution of the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It was the first face-to-face agreement between the government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Negotiations that led to the agreement were an outgrowth of the Madrid Conference of 1991. They were conducted secretly in Oslo, Norway, hosted by the Fafo institute, and completed on 20 August 1993.
The Oslo Accords were officially signed “at a public ceremony in Washington, D.C., on September 13, 1993, in the presence of PLO chairman Yasser Arafat, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and U.S. President Bill Clinton”.
The documents themselves were signed by Mahmoud Abbas for the PLO, foreign Minister Shimon Peres for Israel, U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher for the United States and foreign minister Andrei Kozyrev for Russia.
With the historic photo above vivid in memory, I naturally turned to the usually reliable White House Office of The Historian website to check the details.
Here is the inaccurate description on that White House website:
On September 13, 1993, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas signed a Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, commonly referred to as the “Oslo Accord,” at the White House. Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace.
The Office of The Historian site has rewritten history to first remove Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from that White House signing ceremony, and to replace him with Mahmoud Abbas.
Who outside of Washington’s Israeli-loyalists would believe such distortions?
The site incorrectly reports that Israel’s Rabin signed the document. He did not; Shimon Peres signed for Israel, along with Mahmoud Abbas for the PLO, Warren Christopher, for the U.S., and Andrei Kozyrev, for Russia.
All of which leaves questions: Was this the source that President Trump, or his speech-writer, relied on for the Trump-Abbas meeting? Who rewrote history for the Office of the Historian website?
It would be a massive undertaking to write Yasser Arafat out of world history, so why was
this one moment in his career rewritten?
In George Orwell’s futuristic dystopian novel, 1984, currently growing in popularity, the Ministry of Truth is one of four ministries in the government of the nation Oceania .
In 1984, the Truth Ministry serves as the propaganda ministry and spreads a new language called Newspeak. Wikipedia adds a disturbing reminder of the manner in which the Ministry of Truth doctors “historical records to show a government-approved version of events”.
Is President Trump not even familiar with the historic photo above of the handshake between then-PLO leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin?
There is good reason to believe that he is not a student of history, not even when he is seeking to make history himself.
Mahmoud Abbas will remain here for several more days. When he does return to Palestine, he will have the long flight home to wonder if he has been conned into another journey down “peace talks” lane?
He has heard Trump delete Yasser Arafat from the events of September, 1993. How can he possibly be expected to believe the empty promises he heard uttered from this U.S. President?
The picture above is from Wikipedia.
The man spent most of his adult life collecting money, so please excuse him
Thank you, Jim, for your vigilant reporting that simply has me shaking my head in equal measures of disbelief, dismay, and disgust.
Trump’s manoeuvres are inexcusable. So are Abbas’.
Jim, this is incredible, indeed. I watched Presidents Trump-Abbas on TV this morning. I noticed President Trump’s dramatic “mistake” and wondered what in the world was going on. Trump simply deleted Yaser Arafat from the world-famous handshake image that included Arafat, Rabin, and Clinton. Thank you, Jim for raising this very important point that spells out the disgraceful lack of C-R-E-D-I-B-L-I-T-Y in a big way.
As you rightly hinted, this could not have been a “mistake”. It was an attempt to distort history. it fits in perfectly with everything else Israel and its supporters have been concocting for over 70 years of fabrications, lies, and spin, and extreme distortion of history. They not only had a meticulously distorted narrative, but also have had a monopoly of the media in the West.
One bright spot for me, personally, because I have called for it on many of my e-mails, was that President Abbas, finally, demanded that Israel should also recognize a Palestinian State.
I do not know if it was my imagination, but I think that Trump seemed puzzled, and turned his head towards Abbas, when the latter uttered those words. I guess the thought never even occurred to him.
Truth stands; it needs no public support. It is self-sustained. ~Gandhi
A critically important point, Jim. Thank you!
However, at a deeper level, the Oslo Accords were delusional from the beginning. I’ve read what I think is the only on-the-spot book about the Oslo negotiations. It was clear that Israel had gained the upper hand in the “negotiations.” The interpretations of the Accords were misleading from the beginning.