“Obama’s performance was pathetic,” But How Does President Perry Sound To You?

by James M Wall

Let us be perfectly clear about this. It is true, as Robert Fisk wrote, “Obama’s performance was pathetic”. It was that, and much more.

President Obama’s speech to the United Nations this week was also embarrassing, and grossly insensitive to the reality of the Palestinians who have since 1967, suffered the pain, death and humiliation of  Occupation.

President Obama focused his speech on Israeli security, which has served as the excuse for Israel to continue its ever-expanding control over what is now called the West Bank and Gaza.

One reason the Obama speech was pathetic was that he studiously avoided uttering the word “occupation”. Instead, the President carefully parroted the ultra right wing Israeli narrative with even more vigor than he has used in previous talks to those annual AIPAC Israel-worshipping conferences.

The blame for this speech rests squarely on Obama. He chose his Zionist consigliere, Dennis Ross, as his in-house White House advisor. Ross has been protecting the Israeli narrative as the only Truth permitted in the White House, since he first emerged on the Washington scene as a Middle East “expert” for the first President Bush. Ross does not hide his proclivities, retreating to pro-Israel think tanks between stints in the White House.

Successive presidents from Bush One to Clinton to Obama, have allowed Ross and his Israel Lobby pals to corrode the ability of US political leaders to actually see or feel the suffering of millions of Palestinians who are incarcerated in ever-shrinking plots of their ancestral land.

The alternative? Before you totally abandon Obama, ponder this, how does a President Rick Perry sound to you? This Texas “good ole boy” has already demonstrated that he is an ultra Zionist. Unlike the former Texas governor who was president for eight years, Perry is prepared to preside over what those biblical End Times believers long for, an Israeli-owned Temple Mount to provide Yahweh with a platform on which to set off the final days.

O, Molly Ivins, why did you have to leave us so soon. 

Meanwhile, while Obama follows Ross down the Zionist primrose path, those keepers of the nation’s conscience, mainline religious leaders, paddle along in their interfaith fairy pond, desperately afraid of being called anti-semitic; right wing religious leaders criticize Obama for his lukewarm Zionism; main stream media peddles the Zionist narrative; and over on main street USA, an ignorant American public struggles to survive in a disastrous economy, oblivious to what right wing Zionists have done to our economic health. 

Imagine if all that changed. Imagine, for example, if the major Protestant denominations told the truth about the Occupation, and started preaching, instead, about justice, love and fairness. Imagine if those same denominations discovered they are called to be prophetic and decided forthwith to embrace BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) the Palestinian-inspired strategy that right wing Zionists detest because it has such a powerful non-violent bite.

Support for Palestinian statehood ought to be a slam-dunk. The Palestinian Authority has met, and far exceeded, all requirements for statehood. At the UN Friday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had his moment to formally request what is without question, a status for Palestinians that is long overdue.

Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu followed Abbas to the podium and repeated his praise for President Obama’s earlier speech. He also seemed to enjoy telling the UN members that few in that room liked him. His speech, of course, was filled with what may only charitably be called “untruths”, as this analysis demonstrates

In its report on the speech, the Palestiian news agency, Ma’an, included this sobering reminder of the game the “great powers” will be playing to block Abbas’ request:

The Security Council could delay action on Abbas’ request, giving the mediating “Quartet” — the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations — more time to craft a declaration that could coax the two sides back to the table.

This delaying tactic was orchestrated by the US  to avoid an immediate Obama veto which would play badly at the UN.  What the US wants is for enough of the 15 members of the Security Council to join the US in voting against the Palestinian statehood request, giving Obama the cover of a Security Council 9 to 6 negative vote.

Israel has few, if any, supporters in the UN, as Netanyahu has acknowledged, so for the Security Council to provide Obama with his flimsy cover, some high-powered US pressure would need to be applied. Will pressure work this time?  I don’t think so.

And here is why: The Security Council has five permanent members: China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States, and ten non-permanent members, which serve two year terms. Currently the non permanent members, with the year their terms conclude are Bosnia and Herzegovina (2011), Brazil (2011), Columbia (2012), Gabon (2011), Germany (2012), India (2012), Lebanon (2011), Nigeria (2011), Portugal (2012), and South Africa (2012).

To reject the Palestinian request for statehood and eliminate the need for a veto by the US,  9 members, including the US, would have to vote against Palestinian membership. Do you see eight nations joining the US in that list who would reject the Palestinians? I do not.

Meanwhile, as we await the Security Council vote, which may come next week, or next month, no one knows for sure, the big speeches are out of the way, which means the Palestinian story will once again be relegated to the back pages. This allows the American media to focus even more on the circus that has emerged from the Republican race for the presidential nomination, a race currently led by above-mentioned Texas Governor Rick Perry.

You probably did not read about it in your local paper, but Perry held a press conference in a New York hotel on the day Obama spoke to the UN, timed, Max Blumenthal reports, “to pre-empt Obama’s speech at the UN in which the President would reject Palestinian demands for statehood.”

At the press event, Perry trotted out a cast of characters that looks suspiciously like members of the “brain trust” Perry could elevate to White House power.

New York Democratic Assemblyman Dov Hikind, stood next to Perry at the Press event. Hikind is the former leader of the Jewish Defense League (JDL). The FBI has designated JDL as a “terrorist” organization, which was, according to Blumenthal, “responsible for bombing attacks on numerous Arab-American targets and a conspiracy to murder Republican Rep. Darrell Issa”.

At the press event, Blumenthal reported that Perry issued numerous stentorian condemnations of terror. He then handed the microphone to Hikind, who exclaimed, “I heard the Governor’s speeches and I said to myself, ‘He sounds like me!'” The two men then engaged in a sustained hug much to the delight of the assembled media.

This is the second time in recent months that Dov Hikind has surfaced in New York politics. Writing in both the Mondoweiss and the Beirut-based al-Akhbar web sites, Blumenthal looks back at Hikind’s involvement in the special election in New York’s 9th congressional district, won by a Republican, Bob Turner.

The NY Ninth CD was an overwhelmingly Democratic district until Democrat Anthony Weiner resigned over an internet fiasco. Turner, who had no previous political experience, received the endorsement of former Democratic New York Mayor Ed Koch, a widely publicized shift in party loyalty.

Turner also was endorsed by Democratic Assemblyman Dov Hikind, the same Democratic Assemblyman Hikind who is now strongly supporting Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry. Neither Perry nor Turner has publically expressed any misgivings over Hikind’s previous relationship with the Israeli settler leader Meir Kahane. According to Blumenthal:

Under Kahane’s direction, Hikind operated a front group with the JDL cadre [of] Victor Vancier (aka Chaim Ben Pesach), who served 10 years in prison  for carrying out numerous firebomb attacks on innocent people, and openly contemplated killing the renowned Palestinian professor Edward Said.

It is interesting to note, and a commentary not only on American Jewish-influenced politics, but also mainstream media coverage, that Hikind’s terrorist-related links were never mentioned in the election campaign by Turner’s Democratic opponent, David Weprin. Instead, Weprin and Turner both focused on who would be the best congressman for Israel.

Joining Hikind at Perry’s press event was Dr. Solomon “Joe” Frager, who was listed on official Perry press material, as the organizer of the press conference. Blumenthal provides Frager’s background:

Frager is the Chairman of the Jerusalem Reclamation Project, a front group for the Ateret Cohanim organization that steals Palestinian property in East Jerusalem and hands it over to fanatically religious Jewish families. They are the spearhead of Israel’s slow motion ethnic cleansing of Silwan and the Old City.

What then shall we do with this promising young president, who has humiliated himself, and the nation he leads, on the large UN world stage? Ralph Nader believes Obama should be challenged in the Democratic primaries.  Fortunately, for Obama backers, no one pays much attention to Nader these days, except the right wing Washington Times which eagerly offered Nader space to do his part in bringing in blocking a second Obama term.

Criticism of Obama’s continued capitulation to the Zionist right, gets scant attention in the Mainstream Media, which is why voices like Robert Fisk must be heard and heeded.

Fisk’s report in The Independent was harshly critical of Obama’s speech:

For the American President who called for an end to the Israeli occupation of Arab lands, an end to the theft of Arab land in the West Bank – Israeli “settlements” is what he used to call it – and a Palestinian state by 2011, Obama’s performance was pathetic.

As usual, Hanan Ashrawi, the only eloquent Palestinian voice in New York this week, got it right. “I couldn’t believe what I heard,” she told Ha’aretz, that finest of Israeli newspapers. “It sounded as though the Palestinians were the ones occupying Israel. There wasn’t one word of empathy for the Palestinians. He spoke only of the Israelis’ troubles…”

Too true. And as usual, the sanest Israeli journalists, in their outspoken condemnation of Obama, proved that the princes of American journalists were cowards.

Fisk offers an encouraging (and youthful) example of informed commentary from a member of the younger Israeli generation, Israeli scholar Yael Sternhell (at right), who has written:

The limp, unimaginative speech that US President Barack Obama delivered at the United Nations….reflects how helpless the American President is in the face of Middle East realities.

Obama needs to hear criticism like this from Israel and from alternative US media. As Franklin D. Roosevelt once told a political leader who wanted him to take a progressive action, “Make me do it”.

We are called to make Obama move beyond his UN speech.  He will need all the “making” we can give, to help him escape from Zionist control.

Neither the Progressive cable pundits and most certainly not the Main Street Media, will be of any help in this effort.

That includes pundits like Chris Matthews, who anchors the MSNBC evening lineup. After Friday’s dueling UN speeches by President Abbas and Prime Minister Netanyahu, there was ole Chris acting like the high school Senior Class president who was proud to have as his guest to “discuss” the Middle East,  the ever-charming, slick Israeli ambassador to the US,  Michael Oren, who proceeded to overwhelm Matthews with his usual list of  Israeli promises ( prevarications) that should bring the wayward Palestinians to another round of  “negotiations”.

Matthews is the TV dean of the PEPs (Progressives Except for Palestine). Fortunately, following him in the MSNBC lineup we have the ever-reliable Rachel Maddow, who a week before the dueling UN speeches, interviewed former President Jimmy Carter.  Not surprisingly for her, Maddow asked  Carter about the Palestinian bid for statehood, knowing full well what he would say. Carter was precise: It is time for Palestinian statehood.

Obama has a rough 13 plus months ahead of him before the 2012 election.  He is not likely to confront the media PEPs, nor any other part of the Zionist hasbara that has enveloped this country like a giant octopus.

This leaves us with the option of trusting that in a second term, Barack Obama will return to that 2008 promise, when, as Ron Suskind writes in his latest book, Confidence Men, we experienced that moment of  “dizzying ebullience when Barack Obama and his beautiful family stepped onto the stage in Chicago’s Grant Park as America’s First Family”:

It was a sensation of such intensity as to startle many across the country and around the world into believing in the promise of America, the original and long-burning beacon of the democratic ideal.

Al Jazeera posted a 25-minute news program, “Inside Story“,  Friday. Included are comments by US, Israeli and Palestinian observers.

About wallwritings

From 1972 through 1999, James M. Wall was editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine, based in Chicago, lllinois. He was a Contributing Editor of the Century from 1999 until July, 2017. He has written this blog, wall writings.me, since it was launched April 27, 2008. If you would like to receive Wall Writings alerts when new postings are added to this site, send a note, saying, Please Add Me, to jameswall8@gmail.com Biography: Journalism was Jim's undergraduate college major at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. He has earned two MA degrees, one from Emory, and one from the University of Chicago, both in religion. He is an ordained United Methodist clergy person. He served for two years in the US Air Force, and three additional years in the USAF reserve. While serving on active duty with the Alaskan Command, he reached the rank of first lieutenant. He has worked as a sports writer for both the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, was editor of the United Methodist magazine, Christian Advocate for ten years, and editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine for 27 years.
This entry was posted in Media, Middle East Politics, Politics and Elections, Religion and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to “Obama’s performance was pathetic,” But How Does President Perry Sound To You?

  1. Noushin Framke says:

    Yes indeed, “the Zionist Hasbara has enveloped this country like a giant octopus.” Well said! I will always think of that visual now when I hear and read Hasbara on the airwaves and blogosphere! And thanks for the back story on Perry’s NY connections. Lord have mercy.

  2. jack graham says:

    Perry is a Bible-reading Southerner, and like many in his class he has misread the Abrahamic covenants in the Book of Genesis. There are many Bible-reading Southerners who know that Genesis has nothing to do with the current state of Israel, and that the rise of the state of Israel has nothing to do with the second coming of Christ. Perry can be turned around by showing him what the Bible really says, — relatively easy compared to deaking with a media creation taking orders from Wall Street where the current state of Israel gets its power. — John Remington Graham of the Minnesota Bar (#3664X)

  3. David says:

    Just because Obama’s the lesser evil doesn’t mean he isn’t evil. I’m still voting for a progressive or a write-in.

  4. John Kleinheksel Sr says:

    Dear Jim (and others),
    The behavior of our President is more than embarrassing as you say. Our President backpedalling, abdicating his role, continuing to bend out of shape to protect and support the policies of the most right wing government in recent Israeli history is a scandal of huge proportions.
    He surely doesn’t want to expend any political capital (which just isn’t there anymore anyway), on this little patch of real estate, when his reelection is at stake. And that is more important after all than doing the right thing in getting some things straight with our friends over there.
    Why sacrifice for the Palestinians, who have never amounted to much anyway? Why should we empower them when we all know who the real Power is over there? And here in the US. And don’t you forget it Mr. President. What are friends for? It’s give and take. You give and we’ll take.
    Bottom line: We just don’t care to do our very best. And that is sad and maddening. The plot thickens. Outcomes are beyond anyone’s control. Do the right things and outcomes will take care of themselves, all in due time. Do the wrong things and those outcomes will take place as well, all in due time. JRK

  5. Bill Gepford says:

    After Obama’a UN speech who has the power to control the almost certain reactions from the Arab world? A speech like this has the power to enflame even more the duplicit violence of Al Qaida. The only issues we need to discern is where, when and how intense. By the time we find out it may be too late. May God have mercy upon us.

  6. Bill Gepford says:

    How does President Perry sound to me? A total disaster!!!

  7. Jake Terpstra says:

    May be time for a write-in. How about Kucnich?

  8. Fred says:

    Excellent post Jim. Obama’s speech was indeed pathetic,but I think it was also an election speech, desparately trying not to lose zionist money and votes in the next election. I have read that half of Democratic funding comes from American Jews, many of whom, are ardent zionists, and who put Israel’s interests first and foremost. Obama is being “out Israeled” by the Republican candidates, and he is terrified of losing money, votes and mainstream media support to Perry from this wealthy and influential constituency.

    And I also must agree with you Jim, that however dissappointing Obama is on this issue and others, Perry, or any Republican, would be far worse for this country.

    As an additional comment, I think that Jewish Americans should be concerned about their religion identifying with an apartheid state, that treats non Jews with disregard and denies them basic human rights and equality under the law. Can they possibly think this is a good thing for the Jewish people?

    Fred

  9. I suggest that if the United States vetoes a UN declaration of statehood for Palestine, and then punishes the Palestinians by withholding aid and blocking development, that many of us withhold our tax funds to the U.S.

    The only reason I might possibly vote for Obama right now is that he keeps Lisa Jackson in at EPA. And that might be shaky. Obama is a huge disappointment, and has lied (such as with the Palestinian situation). He needs to be challenged during primary season.

  10. Awad Paul Sifri says:

    The notion of having a Republican president, such as extremist Richard Perry, who owes his election to the ultra-extremist “Zionist Christian Taliban” will be disaster to America and to the Palestinian cause and to the cause of freedom, justice, and democracy in the Middle East.

    It is obvious that America has outsourced its foreign policy to the architects of Zionism, such as, Dulles, Kissinger, Schultz, Wolfowitz, Ross, Indyk, Feith, Pearl, Rubin, and most notoriously Zionist-embedded “Think Tanks”.

    Since 1967, there has been a steady “Zionisation of America”, converting it to an abiding protector, providor, feeder, and enabler of Israeli occupation.

    Yes, Obama is certainly preferable to Perry, or Palin, or Gingritch. But it is wrong to think that a second Obama term will bring any relief. Yes, it is possible that Obama intended for the Palestinians to “free him up”, by waiting until he wins a 2nd term, but unfortunately, that means waiting until November, 2012, which will actually lead well into 2013 for any action.

    By then Israel would have built many more colonial settlements, sealed up East Jerusalem, and deeply protruding West Bank settlement clusters, and the likelihood of war with rebellious Iran, or Syria, or Egypt.

    I still intend to vote for President Obama for a 2nd term, but I expect nothing in return.

    What will actually make the difference on the ground is to enlighten American leadership about the disaster that a continued pro-Israeli occupation will lead to, in terms of vital American interests (including oil), and American blood and treasure.

    Awad

  11. Thomas Chisholm says:

    Any suggestions for an alternate Dem. president? I can’t think of any. The press does not support Third Party candidates. The conclusion: Israel continues to wag the dog and money needed for domestic programs, health and education. etc., continues to be diverted to to protecting Israel against the world. Peace? Just keep blowing those trumpets Joshua!

  12. Yes Obama is pathetic, horrifyingly pathetic. But the problem with this argument is that it doesn’t matter. This issue will NOT be solved by having “the right” President. This issue will rather be solved when we convince the rest of the world to boycott everything Israeli, not just West Bank products, and arrest Israeli war criminals when they step out of Israel.

    The United States is a declining power. Yes, still quite powerful but declining and “fortress US-Israel” will not be able to survive as such if the whole world decides enough is enough.

    Turkey is a good example of expanded power and influence not only in the region but in the world and we know what the Turks think about Israel. A Neo-Ottomanism is developing. Not based on territorial and military means but on economic cooperation and coordination.

    The evils of our coercion and extortion will eventually run out and it won’t matter who the President is.

  13. Samia Khoury says:

    Indeed a pathetic performance with so much contradiction in dealing with issues of freedom and democracy. But as a Palestinian I felt that all through Mr. Obama’s term and especially since he caved in for the first time regarding the settlements, he has been a great disappointment, mainly because he gave his own people as well as the whole world so much hope for a change. And his election as the first black president was in itself a change. We know for us Palestinians it is not going to make a difference who will be the next president, but I will feel sorry for the American citizen who deserves a lot better than that.

  14. Christine says:

    Why do so few Americans know what it is like to live in Palestine today?
    I was shocked to visit the settlements in Palestine/Israel. I thought they were small,temporary places for people who could not find housing in the overcrowded cities but they appeared to be permanent.

  15. Roy Hayes says:

    Good job, Jim. I’ve made arrangements for this essay to get thru to the White House. Peace, Roy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s