Ha’aretz reported Wednesday:
The Palestinian leadership made a mistake by suspending action on a U.N. report on Gaza war crimes, a member of President Mahmoud Abbas’ inner circle said Wednesday – the first such acknowledgment after days of protests in the West Bank and Gaza. . . .
Excerpts from the Ha’aretz story:
Abbas made the [original decision to postpone consideration of the Report] under heavy U.S. pressure, Palestinian and Israeli officials have said. U.S. officials told Palestinian leaders that a war crimes debate would complicate efforts to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, according to participants in such meetings.
Abbas’ aides have defended the step, saying the Palestinians needed more time to win international support for the U.N. report. They said deferring action did not mean burying the report. But Abbas apparently underestimated the angry response at home.
With every day, there were more protests, marches and statements of condemnations, not only from his Hamas rivals, but also from human rights groups and intellectuals.
On Wednesday, senior Abbas adviser Yasser Abed Rabbo told the Voice of Palestine radio that the Palestinian leadership had erred. “What happened is a mistake, but [it] can be repaired,” said Abed Rabbo, secretary general of the Palestine Liberation Organization. “We have the courage to admit there was a mistake.”
In Gaza, public outrage at Abbas reached a new level on Wednesday, when hundreds of posters criticizing the Palestinian president appeared in public areas around Gaza City. Abbas and Hamas have been bitter rivals since the Islamic group violently seized control of Gaza from pro-Abbas forces in June 2007. . . . . . .
On Tuesday, a close associate of Abbas told Haaretz that if Israel does not soften its positions on the peace process, the Palestinian Authority will resume pushing to get the Goldstone report moved to the Security Council, and thence to the International Criminal Court. . . .
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat told the French media Tuesday that Abbas is now considering asking Arab states to raise the Goldstone report in the Security Council themselves. Erekat also threatened to reveal the names of all the countries that pressured Abbas to pull the motion and instead negotiate with Israel without preconditions. . . .
On Monday, Palestinians poured into the streets of Ramallah to protest their government initial decision to “postpone” any action on the Goldstone Report.
The protests came as a surprise to the Palestinian leaders. Over the week-end Karin Laub (Associated Press) described Abbas as rushing “to limit the fallout from his decision”.
What led Abbas to make such a mistake? Is he that removed from the Palestinian people not to be aware that rejecting the Report would have a negative impact?
The Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, based in Jerusalem, issued a statement September 30, which began with a prophetic warning about present conditions in the Occupied Territories. (The statement is being distributed to a wide audience in the US by Friends of Sabeel North America (FOSNA).)
The situation in the Occupied Territories, including the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, is dire and desperate. Israel continues to jeopardize any opportunity for a peaceful negotiated settlement by creating facts on the ground in defiance of the international community.
It is becoming increasingly clear that Israel has already finalized its intended objectives in the Occupied Territories and has a blueprint for a final resolution of the conflict, which it aims to achieve unilaterally. . . .
The Sabeel statement concluded by denouncing the decision of the Palestinian Authority to postpone further attention to the Goldstone Report:
Sabeel strongly denounces the postponement of the discussion of the Goldstone Report on Israel’s war on Gaza, at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. The report must be followed up, Justice must take its course and the guilty must not get away with impunity. (To read the full Sabeel Statement, “Choose Life”, click here.)
President Abbas has lost the respect of his public by allowing his actions to be dictated by the US and Israel. As Ha’aretz columnist Amira Hass reported, Abbas decided to postpone consideration of the Goldstone Report after he met in Ramallah with the American consul-general.
In a single phone call to his man in Geneva, Mahmoud Abbas has demonstrated his disregard for popular action, and his lack of faith in its accumulative power and the place of mass movements in processes of change.
For nine months, thousands of people – Palestinians, their supporters abroad and Israeli anti-occupation activists – toiled to ensure that the legacy of Israel’s military offensive against Gaza would not be consigned to the garbage bin of occupying nations obsessed with their feelings of superiority. Thanks to the Goldstone report, even in Israel voices began to stammer about the need for an independent inquiry into the assault.
But shortly after Abbas was visited by the American consul-general on Thursday, the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization got on the phone to instruct his representative on the United Nations Human Rights Council to ask his colleagues to postpone the vote on the adoption of the report’s conclusions.
Such a meeting would not have taken place without direct orders from the Obama White House, where Obama’s advisors continue to show little sensitivity to the deep resentment the Palestinian public justifiably harbors toward the Israeli government that conducted such a brutal three-week invasion of Gaza earlier this year.
President Obama’s image in the Middle East has been badly battered by his mishandling of the Goldstone Report, a 500-page carefully-documented report that was written under the direction of Richard Goldstone, a South African Jewish judge.
Obama did more than make his own mistake in rejecting the Report. He also forced Mahmoud Abbas to follow Obama’s order to postpone UN consideration of the Goldstone Report.
What is the impact on Abbas’ standing within the West Bank and Gaza?
A leading Palestinian journalist, Rami Khouri, has called on Abbas to resign. Before news broke that PA officials had acknowledged that Abbas made a “mistake”,Khouri wrote in the Beruit Daily Star:
In one move Abbas can help rebuild the credibility of the Palestinian presidency while simultaneously strengthening overall Palestinian national unity and political cohesion.
He should simply call early elections for the Palestine Authority presidency, not stand as a candidate, and instead devote time to using his other position as head of the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s Executive Committee to achieve a critical need absent from Palestinian life for decades: namely, building a national consensus by giving voice to all groups of Palestinians and especially to refugees living in camps throughout the Middle East.
Khouri describes the Goldstone Report as a missed opportunity for President Abbas:
Here was a rare case of a credible international judge making strong accusations against both Israel and Hamas, and suggesting that their conduct be considered by the UN Security Council.
It was an opportunity to bring pressure to bear on Israel through the institutions of the United Nations. However, Abbas caved in to US pressure, making it clear that he was more concerned about his relations with Washington than relations with, well, his own people.
Khouri recalls Abbas’ years of service in the Palestine cause and concludes:
Abbas is a spent force, lacking both serious legitimacy and perceptible impact. He hangs on to some thin threads of credibility from his long association with Yasser Arafat and the Fatah leadership from the days when they represented a Palestinian national strategy, and mattered because they retained some self-respect. Sadly, this is no longer the case.
Khouri acknowledges the deep Palestinian split between Hamas and Fatah, but he points out:
There is still a national consensus that all Palestinians agree on, as expressed in the seminal Prisoners’ Document that came out of the agreement a few years ago among leading Palestinian factions who negotiated it during their stay in Israeli jails.
Looking to a post-Abbas future, Khouri sees an opportunity for Abbas to redeem himself:
Mahmoud Abbas has failed his people, but he can partially redeem himself and set the stage for his successor to play a more effective role. He should act with honor and confidence by stepping down as Palestinian president, calling a new election to bring in a more legitimate and capable leadership, and focusing his energy on where he started his days decades ago when he still had credibility and courage – by reconstituting the PLO as the coordinating body for all Palestinians.
Khouri has the credentials to call on Abbas to resign. He is currently Director of the Issam Fares Institute of Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut as well as editor-at-large of the Daily Star. In October, 2006, he was a visiting scholar at Stanford University, and in November 2006, he was the co-recipient of the Pax Christi International Peace Award for his efforts to bring peace and reconciliation to the Middle East.
President Obama badly mishandled the Goldstone Report. He allowed his White House advisors to mislead him into thinking the Palestinian public would sit quietly by while their president followed instructions from the White House to reject the Goldstone Report.
Obama is surrounded by staff members who are strong supporters of Israel. He is smart enough to recognize that, like Abbas, he also made a mistake, not only by rejecting the Goldstone Report, but by believing he could operate in the Middle East with no Palestinian input into his decision-making.
Mr. President, the White House switchboard will find Rashid Khalidi’s number in New York City.
I am sure he will be happy to talk with you. I am also confident he has Rami Khouri’s Beruit number.
Both men will tell you that Palestinian leaders expect to be treated with the same respect you give other world leaders.
Picture above of President Abbas is by George Azar, from the New York Times
It has been a well known fact for years that the PA is just another layer of the Occupation! But I have compassion for Abbas; he really did try to confront the ’empire’ -USA and Israel imperialism!
In 2005, as the Christian delegate for The Olive Trees Foundation for Peace, I met with Rafiq Husseini, Chief of Staff to President Abbas and he told me:
“We have lost more than 1.1 million fruit-bearing trees in Palestinian territories. Trees are about food, the environment, and life. Ancient trees have been demolished by tanks, and we thank the Olive Trees Foundation for Peace for addressing the need to replace them and rebuild the faith of our people.
“Palestine has always been tolerant to people of all religions. The Jews came here out of Spain along with many Arabs–and then came Zionism. When one wants to take over another, war happens.
“President Abbas is a very bad politician; he does not lie! He is ready to move on from the past. We have quit crying over our losses; we must move on. Live and let live is the motto of this administration!
Excerpted from “KEEP HOPE ALIVE”
Thank you for an outstanding article. Please allow me to share some brief history that has led us to today.
It is evident after 61 woeful years of Israeli Zionist occupation of Palestine, the successive Israeli governments – Likud and Labor – want nothing less than occupation of ALL of historic Palestine.
People have no clue of history, except what they see in the movies and ever lying docudramas. The ancient Hebrews were immigrants to Palestine, if you like. They came to Palestine/Canaan from Ur which lies in modern Iraq of today. The Palestinians are descendants of all the ancient people who lived in Palestine from time immemorial, including the first inhabitants of Palestine who were the Canaanites and Philistines, Amorites, Gergashites, Jebusites.
They also mixed with various invaders such as the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Hittites, Hebrews, Arabs, Crusaders, Seljuk Turks, and Ottoman Turks. Under the Arab Empire, the “mixed” population of Palestine adopted the Arabic language and culture and most converted to Islam. The Arab Empire allowed Christians in Palestine to retain their religion, if they wished to. Most actually did so. They are the remnants of the most ancient Christians in the world today and they are emigrating primarily because of Israeli occupation and the terrible economic situation enforced by Israel.
In the 20th Century, and for the first time in history, an occupier – this time, Israel – is attempting to throw out the Palestinian Arabs of Israel who represent 20 % of the population of Israel “proper” and the Palestinians in the post-1967 portion of Palestine, which makes up a mere 22 % of historic Palestine.
The Palestinian leadership should know better than to carry out any Zionist US-instigated conspiracies in the region. Covering up Goldstone’s Report would get no Israeli compromise of any sort. They will hold on to every inch they have occupied including the 1967 second stage of occupation.
Last Nov. during Sabeel’s 7th International Conference: THE NAKBA: MEMORY, REALITY AND BEYOND:
That report here:
Rashid Khaladi noted: “Everywhere except in America, the Palestinian narrative is well known.”
I am always intrigued that politicians often use the exculpatory passive to soften criticism. In this case, the Abbas reversal was reported as “a mistake was made,” not “WE made a mistake.”